3: February 2003 Archives
Another Sunday evening, another week I'm not quite ready to begin yet. I'm starting to think this is a trend.
When I made my first little foray into public display of my politics, this guy kept riding over the Congress Ave. bridge and booing us. "Disgraceful!" he shouted. "If it weren't for war, you wouldn't have the right to protest anything."
And I kept thinking to myself, "He's completely missing the point."
I'm not anti-American. I never have been. And in my opinion, the most important right afforded to me by the Constitution is the freedom of speech. It's misguided of that guy to think that I underestimate it. It also seems like faulty logic for him to assume that asking for peace now is going to undermine our freedom of speech -- as though Saddam Hussein is planning on coming to the U.S. to take it away from us himself. Somehow, that seems highly unlikely.
In general, I tend not to pay attention to alarmist rhetoric from either side of the political spectrum. Lately, the things I've been hearing outside of mainstream media have led me to question that policy.
I studied media as an undergraduate and as a graduate student, long enough to know that people believe the information fed to them by what they believe to be a reliable source. Network news qualifies in this scenario, but freedom of the press only extends to a press that works outside of someone's political agenda to deliver accurate information. Mainstream media has been squarely in Bush's camp, with regard to war and weapons inspections and terrorism. The straight truth is that if a news story isn't picked up by one of the five major news networks (NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX, or CNN), 99% of the American population will never know about it at all. The slightest hint of information will be shot down as "leftist propaganda," and that'll be the end of it. (One of the greatest victories of the internet, in my opinion, is that this information will continue to circulate on a global scale in some venue, but that's the topic of another rant altogether.)
The state of my country today puts me in mind of an Ani Difranco lyric:
"I'm gonna take all my friends
and move to Canada,
and we're gonna die of old age."
This song has been playing in my head a lot lately. I especially like the protective bent of the lyrics -- not only is she intent on self-preservation, but Ani plans to take her loved ones with her, to ensure their safety as well. It's not easy to live in a country that takes it upon itself to police the rest of the planet, for better or for worse, and the idea of leaving based on political principle, though entirely unrealistic, has become less and less whimsical everytime I've discussed it. I can actually give you a basic overview of the immigration laws for Canada, but that, too, is a subject for another rant.
But when it comes right down to it, America is home. It's the place I grew up, and I can't imagine living anywhere else. It's sort of like the old house I lived in growing up -- the windows were drafty, the natural gas pipes leaked a bit (this wasn't really a problem, since the house was so poorly insulated that the natural gas dissipated before it could cause us any lasting harm), and there wasn't a square corner in the place, but it was home, and I couldn't imagine leaving it.
The analogous question in my mind remains, though: if I knew a hurricane were coming, could I possibly stay?
It's after midnight, but I don't want to go to sleep yet, as that would signify the end of my weekend. Instead, I'll tell you what I remember.
When Challenger was lost in 1986, I was nine years old. Jo Ann remembers it in much more detail than I do, but I remember that it was a rainy day, and that we were sitting in a little portable building in uncomfortable wooden desks. At nine years, I wasn't really able to piece together the significance of the whole tragedy at first, but seeing the news reels of the exploding shuttle playing in an almost continuous loop when I got home helped me realize its importance. I remember my mom being there when I got home from school -- unusual, since school let out much earlier than her job did -- and she was watching the newscasts. They continued for a very long time that night.
Until September 11th, the Challenger explosion seemed to be the main "where were you when..." question for those of my age group. In my mind, it was dwarfed as a landmark experience from that day on.
Yesterday morning -- Saturday, that is -- I woke up late and did a quick check of my usual web reads. The only hint I had of the Columbia disaster was a cryptic e-mail about the loss of seven souls. I think that my mind connected the message with violence in Europe or the Middle East, and I didn't think much of it.
The news, when it came, arrived via Romania, of all places. C yelled, "Rachel, go to cnn.com!" I asked why, and she replied (very tersely, for her) "Just go!" She was talking to her parents on the phone.
I was shocked when I found out what had happened. I don't remember the thought of terrorist involvement ever entering my mind, but I read almost immediately that terrorism had been mostly discounted as a cause of the disaster.
Right then, a large boom shook the house and the power went off, turning off my computer. C and I both yelled in surprise, and both of us momentarily thought a piece of the wreckage had fallen. It wasn't until later that I found out that the tragedy had happened a couple of hours prior.
It was a gorgeous day -- warm and sunny with hardly a cloud in the sky -- and it struck me as ironic that national tragedies always seem to happen on unseasonably glorious days. I knew that the Capitol's flag was at half-mast, and I wanted to take that picture, vivid against the blue sky, as a memorial. As we made our way around town, first to the Capitol and then geocaching in a beautiful, tranquil park, I was struck by the increasing number of flags flying at half-mast, as well as by the constant talk of it on people's lips.
It's hard for me to isolate the reason why this tragedy, this loss of seven souls, hits us so hard when the crash of a small plane with seven passengers aboard might rate scarcely more than a mention. I don't mean to dispute the disparity -- only to acknowledge it.
Maybe it's that the space program is a high-profile project with extensive news coverage. Maybe it's that astronauts are revered as heros, as brilliant and courageous souls. Maybe it's that they're pioneers, an esteemed few who are chosen to race amongst the stars and dance through constellations.
Maybe it's that every child dreams deep-down of growing up to be an astronaut someday.
